On Aug. 25, 2009, several nonprofit groups submitted comments highlighting concerns about USAID’s proposal to apply its Partner Vetting System (PVS) to contractors in acquisitions. Labeling provisions in the proposal incomplete and “inappropriate,” the comments call for additional dialogue and collaboration between USAID and the nonprofit sector before implementation. The comments echo similar complaints made about the PVS for NGOs.
“We urge USAID to delay any implementation of PVS until it has conducted a thorough review of the program. This approach would be responsive to concerns raised by the nonprofit sector as well in the Senate State, Foreign Operations Appropriations Committee. On July 9, 2009 the committee passed a bill (S. 1434) seeking a “comprehensive review” of PVS.”
The comments describe the proposed PVS for contractors as a source of potential problems that “outweigh any benefits gained.” The comments focused on the following points:
“In the proposed contractor rule USAID appropriately states that its goal is a rule that “minimizes the impact on our programs and contractors while still protecting against the possibility that USAID funds could benefit terrorist groups.” USAID has not stated this as a goal for its rule for NGOs.”
“The proposed appeal/reconsideration process for contractors is more specific than the process USAID has provided for NGOs.”
Nonprofit groups from around the country, Defending Dissent Foundation, Grantmakers Without Borders, Grassroots International, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law and OMB Watch signed the comments.