Human Rights

U.S.’s First Report to UN Human Rights Council Admits Shortcomings

Date: 
August 30, 2010

On Aug. 20, 2010, the U.S. government made public its report on its human rights record to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights. The report is one step in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process in which UN member-state’s human rights records is examined once every four years. This is the first time the U.S. has submitted a report on its human rights record, and its work drew mixed reviews from civil rights and liberty advocates who had hoped it would reflect more of the concerns and recommendations raised by the U.S. nonprofit sector. The U.S.’ review before the UN is scheduled for Nov. 5, 2010 in Geneva, Switzerland. 

NGO Impartiality May Upset Some, But Is Important for All

Date: 
June 16, 2010
Author: 
Suraj K. Sazawal

The International Committee of the Red Cross is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance.

State & Justice Officials: Respect for Human Rights Fundamental in Combating Terrorism

Date: 
June 7, 2010

A joint declaration by the United States and European Union saying respecting human rights and complying with international law are “fundamental principles” in combating terrorism received praise from both Justice and State officials. Issued on June 3, 2010, the statement outlines a comprehensive and cooperative anti-terrorist strategy seeking to “diminish the long term threat of violent extremism.” It calls for implementation of UN Resolution 1904, reaffirmation of the 2006 United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, and acknowledges the vital role aid and development groups play in reducing terrorism and addressing the needs of vulnerable people.  

Film: Profiling Prejudice in National Security Measures

Date: 
May 17, 2010

An April 2010 documentary focuses on discriminatory profiling conducted by U.S. government officials in the name of national security. Americans on Hold: Profiling Prejudice and National Security, is a film based on a 2007 report by the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at the NYU School of Law.  It describes the barriers that many Muslims, Arabs, South Asians and Middle Easterners encounter while applying to become a U.S. citizen. Both the film and report examine the uphill process of becoming a U.S. citizen that contributes to the weakening of political engagement by immigrant communities.

U.S. Nonprofit Rights Highlighted in UN Human Rights Submission

Date: 
April 20, 2010

On April 19, 2010 a coalition of charitable, development, human rights and other organizations submitted a report to the United Nations Human Rights Council calling on the United States' government to “re-assess its national security and counterterrorism laws as applied to civil society organizations.” The filing, part of the UN's Universal Periodic Review of the U.S. human rights record, recommended that U.S. laws and policy provide for “clear standards, fair redress procedures, and protection for humanitarian aid, charitable funds and free speech.”  

UN Will Evaluate Human Rights Record of U.S., Rights of Civil Society an Issue

Date: 
March 12, 2010

For the first time, the United States will have its human rights record evaluated by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The UN’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) will assess if the U.S. is meeting its human rights obligations and will offer recommendations for improving the government’s commitments to promoting human rights. The State Department is “encouraging the American public, including non-governmental organizations and civil society” to submit their own evaluations of the U.S.’ adherence to human rights standards. The Charity and Security Network’s report will focus on the negative impact national security laws have had on U.S. nonprofits and their humanitarian programs. Comments are due no later than April 19, 2010.  

Book: Civil Rights in Wartime

Date: 
December 30, 2009

In their December 2009 book, Civil Rights in Wartime: The Post 9/11 Sikh Experience, Dawinder S. Sidhu and Singh Gohil expose the civil rights challenges faced by Sikh-Americans after Sept. 11, 2001. According to the authors, misunderstanding and confusion has lead to wide-spread discrimination for Sikh-Americans. First-person essays by Sikh-Americans relay a variety of issues including the marginalization experienced by many for wearing traditional garments (turbans) for religious reasons. Sidhu and Gohil offer ways that laws and improved cultural understanding can help ease the tensions and ensure their civil rights are upheld.

State Department Leaders Promote Human Rights as an Antidote to Violence

Date: 
December 15, 2009

In two speeches marking the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Daniel Benjamin, State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism, acknowledged the role of poverty and injustice in leading people to violence. They said the Obama administration will have a "wide focus" in addressing these issues. To be successful, this focus will need to address counterproductive rules for charities and charitable giving.  

Thoughts about Charities on Human Rights Day 2009

Date: 
December 10, 2009
Author: 
Kay Guinane

Human Rights Day, December 10, is an important reminder of our shared values supporting and protecting the most vulnerable in the world and sustaining a democratic society.  The mission of the organizations that make up the Charity and Security Network is to make these values be more than a mission statement by putting them into practice.  When U.S. security policy creates unnecessary and unreasonable barriers to practicing these values, we seek to remove them. 
 

Geneva Conventions Turn 60: Still Relevant for NGOs in Conflict Zones

Date: 
August 14, 2009

The 60 year anniversary of the four Geneva Conventions served as the backdrop for an appeal to protect vulnerable citizens who have become increasingly targeted in contemporary warfare. At a ceremony in Geneva on Aug. 12, 2009, Jakob Kellenberger, the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) warned that under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) political and military goals cannot supercede the humanitarian imperative. 

Syndicate content