Criminal cases

Holy Land Foundation and its Leaders Petition for Re-hearing on Dismissal of their Appeal

Date: 
January 17, 2012

The Holy Land Foundation (HLF) and its leaders have both filed petitions for re-hearing of their appeals from criminal convictions for material support of terrorism and other charges. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed their appeals in December 2011. The petitions argue that the court should grant a re-hearing because the case involves legal questions of exceptional importance. The court generally rules on petitions for re-hearing within 30 days. 

Former Islamic American Relief Agency (Missouri) Officials Sentenced

Date: 
January 16, 2012

On Jan. 11, 2012, U.S. District Judge Nanette Laughrey sentenced former officials of the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA) for violating Iraq economic sanctions and illegally acting as an unregistered foreign agent. None of the men charged in the criminal case, first filed in 2007, were alleged to have provided support to terrorists. In addition, a former congressman and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations was sentenced to one year in prison for obstructing justice and acting as an unregistered foreign agent on behalf of IARA. IARA was shut down in October 2004 after being designated a terrorist entity by the Department of Treasury.

Summary: The Fifth Circuit’s Holy Land Foundation Decision

Date: 
December 20, 2011
Author: 
By Alan R. Kabat, Bernabei & Wachtel, PLLC

On December 7, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its long-anticipated decision
in the Holy Land Foundation prosecution.  United States v. El-Mezain, et al., No. 09-10560, __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 6058592 (5th Cir. Dec. 7, 2011). While this decision upheld the jury verdict and judgment against the defendants, the Fifth Circuit did address a number of issues of broader legal significance, and recognized the legitimacy of several arguments raised by the defendants as to the improper use of certain categories of evidence at trial.

Court Denies Appeal of Holy Land Foundation and Leaders

Date: 
December 20, 2011

The 2008 convictions of the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) and five of its leaders were upheld by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 7, 2011. Because HLF was unrepresented the trial judge appointed an attorney to represent it on appeal. The appeals court dismissed HLF's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, saying it "was unauthorized and thus invalid, thereby depriving us of jurisdiction." The court ruled against the individual leaders on most issues, but also ruled that although in some cases the trail court erred on the law, the error was harmless because there was sufficient other evidence to sustain a conviction.

Summary: The Fifth Circuit’s Holy Land Foundation Decision

Date: 
December 20, 2011
Author: 
By Alan R. Kabat, Bernabei & Wachtel, PLLC

On December 7, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its long-anticipated decision in the Holy Land Foundation prosecution.  United States v. El-Mezain, et al., No. 09-10560, __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 6058592 (5th Cir. Dec. 7, 2011). While this decision upheld the jury verdict and judgment against the defendants, the Fifth Circuit did address a number of issues of broader legal significance, and recognized the legitimacy of several arguments raised by the defendants as to the improper use of certain categories of evidence at trial.

Charity Charged with Violating Economic Sanctions in Grants to Orphanage

Date: 
February 5, 2008
The Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA-USA) and five of its leaders have been charged with engaging in prohibited transactions with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, an Afghan rebel leader who was designated as a terrorist in 2003. IARA-USA, which was shut down in October 2004, was funding an orphanage in the Shamshatu Refugee Camp in Pakistan that is located on land belonging to Hekmatyar. The defendants are not charged with supporting terrorism. The leaders, along with a former member of Congress, Mark J. Siljander, have also been charged with misappropriating funds from a federal grant to pay for Siljander to lobby for IARA-USA's removal from a Senate list of organizations suspected of supporting terrorism. The trial is scheduled for November.

Guilty Verdicts in Somali Aid Trial

Date: 
November 1, 2011

On Oct. 20, 2011, a jury found two Minnesota women guilty of raising funds for al Shabaab, Somali militants that are on the U.S. terrorist list. The women were convicted on charges including conspiracy to provide material support to a designated terrorist organization and lying to Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) agents. Each count of providing material support carries a 15-year sentence; lying to the FBI carries a maximum of eight years. The women insisted the money was not going to fund terrorism and were instead raising money to help the people affected by the famine and civil war in Somalia. They also said at the time they were unaware al Shabaab was on the U.S. list. No date has been set for their sentencing.

Charity Leader Sentenced to 33 Months for Tax Evasion

Date: 
October 17, 2011

On Sept. 27, 2011 the former head of an Oregon-based charity was sentenced to nearly three years in prison for tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the government.    The sentence comes more than a year after Pete Seda, the co-founder of the now-defunct Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation in Ashland, was convicted in September 2010. Federal Judge Michael Hogan said there was insufficient evidence to add an additional 8 years to the sentence for “terrorism enhacement” as prosecutors had requested. Attorneys for Seda said they will file an appeal.

Somalia Aid Trial in Minnesota Hears Closing Arguments

Date: 
October 17, 2011

The trial of two Minnesotans accused of funneling money to a designated terrorist group in Somalia held closing arguments on Oct. 17, 2011. The two women each face one charge of conspiracy to provide material support to al-Shabaab, a U.S. designated terrorist organization that operates in Somalia, and other charges. Attorneys for the defendants claim they were helping their fellow Somalis and unaware of the U.S. designation of al-Shabaab as a terrorist group. Al-Shabaab was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government in February 2008.

Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation of Oregon v. Treasury: Summary of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling that Treasury's Listing Procedures are Unconstitutional

Date: 
October 4, 2011

On Sept. 23, 2011 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that procedures used by the Department of Treasury to shut down the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation of Oregon (AHIF-OR) in 2004 are unconstitutional. The court said the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of due process requires Treasury to give adequate notice of the reasons it puts a group on the terrorist list, as well as a meaningful opportunity to respond. In addition, the court ruled that freezing the groups assets amounts to a seizure under the Fourth Amendment, so that a court order is required. The court also ruled that a group that wishes to engage in joint communications with AHIF-OR may do so, distinguishing the facts from the Supreme Court's decision in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (HLP).

Syndicate content